Call for papers and
session proposals
The
call for papers and sessions is
now open.
Paper
proposals
Proposals
may be made by all rural
historians, including independent scholars and doctoral students, who
are in
sympathy with the aims of the conference. Papers should represent the
best in
current research. Whilst many will address local or regional issues, we
are
especially interested in papers which address international issues, or
national
issues in a comparative context. Papers may also be submitted which
outline new
methodological approaches or documentary sources.
Submissions
should be made in the form of a short abstract of the paper (150-200
words) and
a short cv of the applicant of about the same length. Please
do not send extended abstracts or full length cvs.
Closing date
PLEASE
NOTE THAT THE CLOSING DATE FOR PAPERS AND SESSIONS WILL NOW BE 11
JANUARY 2010.
Making a
proposal
Proposals
should sent by email to
Professor Richard Hoyle at r.w.hoyle@reading.ac.uk.
Invitations
to contribute to sessions
The
following session proposals have been made. Please contact the
relevant lead person below directly if you wish to be considered
for the sessions
Peasant diaries, autobiographies, recollections
between the late 19th century and mid-20th century.
Peasant
diaries in continental Europe reflect
the
highly differentiated local patterns of traditional faming life and
methods. They
also tell us a great deal about the mobilization of rural population
and its
penetration by market forces as well as the constantly expanding
demands of
state agencies. All leave their marks on the pages of these diaries and
recollections.
How do peasant diaries reflect the changing
scope of the world, which a peasant farmer experiences? In what ways
will the
economic and farming changes be contrasted with the more stable ideal
picture
of a peasant family economy? Is it possible to systematically compare the diaries and recollections
according to the time, the circumstances of its author in which it has
been
produced, the economic and social characteristics of the author and
furthermore
also to compare them over time and space, arriving at an international
and inter-temporal
mosaic?
I has to be acknowledged, that this is not the
first major attempt to tread this path of research – Northern
German and Danish
researchers had a major network running which looked at these issues
between the
late eighties and 2005 when it petered out. My surmise is, that it had
a fate
which it did not deserve, for if adequate frameworks can be found for
systematic comparisons, there would be further potential in this type
of source
and research.
I suggest that each participant should be
trying to engage explicitly in interregional and inter-temporal
comparisons.
Interested
participants should contact András Vári (h7506var@ella.hu).
Rural cooperatives (credit, consumer,
marketing, dairy) as vehicles of social and economic integration
– or basis of
segregation (1870s - 1930s)
Co-operatives
are by definition tools for building institutional
networks and ways and forms of joining
larger integrations. But building a network may at the same time be
a
decision against participating in larger economic integration,
therefore it may
be a step towards rejecting this larger integration. This has been
usually
studied, if at all, at the level of the ideologues of the co-operative
movements, or, even worse, taking the views of the different political ideologies as a starting
point. Yet the question: ‘Who do I trust, who do I work
with?’ – was of obvious
relevance and it was a question that had to be answered daily. It was
also a
question where cultural preferences were inextricably linked with
economics and
farming practices – trust and cooperation meant a very different
thing in a
consumer co-operative than in a dairy co-op.
There is evident need here for a more complex
view of co-operatives, which would combine the contemporary technical
and
economical determinants of co-ops with consideration of differing
cultural and
political contexts in which they operated. Only in such a complex field
of
determinants would it be adequate and worth while to look at different,
rival
mobilization efforts of rural elites and mobilization paths of rural
people.
Since this is a very complex issue, which has
not really been looked at, I think a paper does best if it concentrates
on one
particular setting, exploring the dynamics of integration and
disintegration,
with special regard to the interplay of farming practice and cultural
preference – though comparisons are welcome.
Interested
participants should contact András Vári (h7506var@ella.hu).
The
history of animal husbandry
Proposal
from Professor Janken Myrdal and Jesper Larsson
Animal husbandry practice ranges from
nomadism to year round stabling and
include herds of various sizes and animal composition. Animal husbandry
had
social, economic and cultural implications on individuals, communities and society. We call for papers from all
disciplines dealing with animal husbandry.
A session on
Dynamics in land use and animal
husbandry in Sweden will also be held in this theme.
Theme chair:
Professor Janken Myrdal
Interested
participants should contact
Jesper.Larsson@ekon.slu.se
.
|